Axis Children's Fund - Lock in vs Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in
Updated June 2026 · both Childrens funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in has the higher 3-year return (+9.12%); Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.23). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | Axis Children's Fund - Lock in | Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -2.95% | -2.95% |
| 3Y CAGR | +8.98% | +9.12% |
| 5Y CAGR | +7.86% | +8.04% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Max drawdown | -18.2% | -18.1% |
| Volatility | 11.0% | 11.0% |
| Alpha | -2.35% | -2.22% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.43% | 1.43% |
| AUM | ₹757 Cr | ₹137 Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (1.43%), versus 1.43% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in has the higher 3-year CAGR (+9.12%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.