DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs CANARA ROBECO EQUITY HYBRID FUND
Updated June 2026 · both Aggressive Hybrid funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the higher 3-year return (+12.50%); CANARA ROBECO EQUITY HYBRID FUND has the lower expense ratio (0.68%); CANARA ROBECO EQUITY HYBRID FUND has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.47). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund | CANARA ROBECO EQUITY HYBRID FUND |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -4.81% | -2.13% |
| 3Y CAGR | +12.50% | +11.69% |
| 5Y CAGR | +10.46% | +10.58% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.43 | 0.47 |
| Max drawdown | -17.3% | -14.1% |
| Volatility | 11.1% | 10.7% |
| Alpha | +4.19% | +3.72% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.15% | 0.68% |
| AUM | ₹11.8K Cr | ₹11.1K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
CANARA ROBECO EQUITY HYBRID FUND has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.68%), versus 1.15% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+12.50%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.