DSP ELSS Tax Saver Fund vs HDFC ELSS Tax saver
Updated June 2026 · both ELSS funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: DSP ELSS Tax Saver Fund has the higher 3-year return (+16.58%); HDFC ELSS Tax saver has the lower expense ratio (1.17%); HDFC ELSS Tax saver has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.82). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | DSP ELSS Tax Saver Fund | HDFC ELSS Tax saver |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -4.56% | -6.35% |
| 3Y CAGR | +16.58% | +15.52% |
| 5Y CAGR | +13.79% | +16.13% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 |
| Max drawdown | -17.1% | -14.8% |
| Volatility | 14.6% | 13.0% |
| Alpha | +2.96% | +3.11% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.19% | 1.17% |
| AUM | ₹16.9K Cr | ₹16.4K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
HDFC ELSS Tax saver has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (1.17%), versus 1.19% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
DSP ELSS Tax Saver Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+16.58%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.