ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF vs Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 Fund of Fund
Updated June 2026 · both FoF Domestic funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 Fund of Fund has the higher 3-year return (+40.06%); Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 Fund of Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.19%); ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.82). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF | Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 Fund of Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -3.61% | +76.36% |
| 3Y CAGR | +15.63% | +40.06% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.47% | +25.72% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Max drawdown | -13.0% | -30.4% |
| Volatility | 11.6% | 25.4% |
| Alpha | - | +4.76% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.43% | 0.19% |
| AUM | ₹8.7K Cr | ₹6.0K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 Fund of Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.19%), versus 0.43% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 Fund of Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+40.06%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.