ICICI Prudential All Seasons Bond Fund vs Kotak Dynamic Bond Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Dynamic Bond funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential All Seasons Bond Fund has the higher 3-year return (+7.69%); Kotak Dynamic Bond Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.59%); ICICI Prudential All Seasons Bond Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe -0.15). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential All Seasons Bond Fund | Kotak Dynamic Bond Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +4.63% | +3.98% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.69% | +7.50% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.98% | +6.45% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.15 | -0.28 |
| Max drawdown | -1.5% | -2.4% |
| Volatility | 1.6% | 2.6% |
| Alpha | +1.31% | +1.69% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.63% | 0.59% |
| AUM | ₹14.7K Cr | ₹2.6K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Kotak Dynamic Bond Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.59%), versus 0.63% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential All Seasons Bond Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+7.69%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.