ICICI Prudential Bond Fund vs Kotak Bond Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Medium to Long Duration funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Bond Fund has the higher 3-year return (+7.17%); ICICI Prudential Bond Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.54%); Kotak Bond Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe -0.42). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Bond Fund | Kotak Bond Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +3.48% | +3.10% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.17% | +6.98% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.26% | +6.16% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.46 | -0.42 |
| Max drawdown | -1.9% | -2.4% |
| Volatility | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Alpha | +0.05% | -0.15% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.54% | 0.69% |
| AUM | ₹2.9K Cr | ₹2.0K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
ICICI Prudential Bond Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.54%), versus 0.69% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Bond Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+7.17%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.