ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund vs Tata Digital India Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Sectoral/Thematic funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund has the higher 3-year return (+18.18%); Tata Digital India Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.81%); ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.84). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund | Tata Digital India Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -1.45% | -21.55% |
| 3Y CAGR | +18.18% | +6.98% |
| 5Y CAGR | +16.68% | +6.81% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.84 | 0.22 |
| Max drawdown | -14.4% | -33.3% |
| Volatility | 13.4% | 19.9% |
| Alpha | +5.77% | -3.55% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.96% | 0.81% |
| AUM | ₹15.7K Cr | ₹10.9K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Tata Digital India Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.81%), versus 0.96% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+18.18%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.