ICICI Prudential Children's Fund vs Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in
Updated June 2026 · both Childrens funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Children's Fund has the higher 3-year return (+15.41%); Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in has the lower expense ratio (1.43%); ICICI Prudential Children's Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.61). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Children's Fund | Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -2.02% | -2.95% |
| 3Y CAGR | +15.41% | +9.12% |
| 5Y CAGR | +13.43% | +8.04% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.61 | 0.23 |
| Max drawdown | -15.4% | -18.1% |
| Volatility | 12.9% | 11.0% |
| Alpha | +2.94% | -2.22% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 2.25% | 1.43% |
| AUM | ₹1.4K Cr | ₹137 Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Axis Children's Fund - No Lock in has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (1.43%), versus 2.25% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Children's Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+15.41%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.