ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF vs ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF
Updated June 2026 · both FoF Domestic funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF has the higher 3-year return (+15.63%); ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF has the lower expense ratio (0.43%); ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.82). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +0.58% | -3.61% |
| 3Y CAGR | +11.89% | +15.63% |
| 5Y CAGR | +11.33% | +14.47% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| Max drawdown | -7.9% | -13.0% |
| Volatility | 6.2% | 11.6% |
| Alpha | - | - |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.44% | 0.43% |
| AUM | ₹28.5K Cr | ₹8.7K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.43%), versus 0.44% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Active FOF has the higher 3-year CAGR (+15.63%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.