ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF vs Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF
Updated June 2026 · both FoF Domestic funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF has the higher 3-year return (+11.89%); ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF has the lower expense ratio (0.44%); ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.82). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF | Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage Omni FOF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +0.58% | +5.51% |
| 3Y CAGR | +11.89% | +7.78% |
| 5Y CAGR | +11.33% | - |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.82 | 0.18 |
| Max drawdown | -7.9% | -1.0% |
| Volatility | 6.2% | 1.5% |
| Alpha | - | - |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.44% | 0.45% |
| AUM | ₹28.5K Cr | ₹7.6K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.44%), versus 0.45% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Asset Allocation Active FOF has the higher 3-year CAGR (+11.89%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.