ICICI Prudential Equity Arbitrage Fund vs Aditya Birla Sun Life Arbitrage Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Arbitrage funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: Aditya Birla Sun Life Arbitrage Fund has the higher 3-year return (+7.60%); Aditya Birla Sun Life Arbitrage Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.31%). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Equity Arbitrage Fund | Aditya Birla Sun Life Arbitrage Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +6.44% | +6.58% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.49% | +7.60% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.60% | +6.68% |
| Sharpe ratio | - | - |
| Max drawdown | -0.3% | -0.3% |
| Volatility | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Alpha | -0.02% | +0.08% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.40% | 0.31% |
| AUM | ₹32.6K Cr | ₹26.2K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Aditya Birla Sun Life Arbitrage Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.31%), versus 0.40% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
Aditya Birla Sun Life Arbitrage Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+7.60%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.