ICICI Prudential Long Term Bond Fund vs Axis Long Duration Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Long Duration funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Long Term Bond Fund has the higher 3-year return (+6.28%); Axis Long Duration Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.33%); Axis Long Duration Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe -0.17). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Long Term Bond Fund | Axis Long Duration Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +0.80% | +0.11% |
| 3Y CAGR | +6.28% | +5.63% |
| 5Y CAGR | +5.24% | - |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.51 | -0.17 |
| Max drawdown | -4.6% | -5.6% |
| Volatility | 3.6% | 4.7% |
| Alpha | +0.28% | -0.45% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.43% | 0.33% |
| AUM | ₹986 Cr | ₹254 Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Axis Long Duration Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.33%), versus 0.43% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Long Term Bond Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+6.28%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.