ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund vs Kotak Bond Short Term
Updated June 2026 · both Short Duration funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund has the higher 3-year return (+7.91%); Kotak Bond Short Term has the lower expense ratio (0.39%). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund | Kotak Bond Short Term |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +5.96% | +4.97% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.91% | +7.50% |
| 5Y CAGR | +7.08% | +6.46% |
| Sharpe ratio | - | -0.67 |
| Max drawdown | -0.7% | -1.3% |
| Volatility | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Alpha | +0.87% | +0.55% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.45% | 0.39% |
| AUM | ₹22.3K Cr | ₹17.2K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Kotak Bond Short Term has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.39%), versus 0.45% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+7.91%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.