Nippon India ETF Gold BeES vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF
Updated June 2026 · both Gold funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has the higher 3-year return (+33.06%); ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 1.08). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | Nippon India ETF Gold BeES | ICICI Prudential Gold ETF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +48.98% | +49.42% |
| 3Y CAGR | +32.72% | +33.06% |
| 5Y CAGR | +22.80% | +23.07% |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| Max drawdown | -22.3% | -22.2% |
| Volatility | 16.1% | 16.1% |
| Alpha | - | - |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | - | - |
| AUM | ₹53.3K Cr | ₹23.7K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has performed better over 3 years?
ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has the higher 3-year CAGR (+33.06%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.