Nippon India Large Cap Fund vs Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Large Cap funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: Nippon India Large Cap Fund has the higher 3-year return (+13.74%); Nippon India Large Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.69%); Nippon India Large Cap Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.73). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | Nippon India Large Cap Fund | Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -5.08% | -5.33% |
| 3Y CAGR | +13.74% | +9.88% |
| 5Y CAGR | +15.02% | +9.52% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.73 | 0.36 |
| Max drawdown | -15.4% | -17.4% |
| Volatility | 13.9% | 13.4% |
| Alpha | +3.54% | -0.29% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.69% | 0.80% |
| AUM | ₹50.1K Cr | ₹39.7K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Nippon India Large Cap Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.69%), versus 0.80% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
Nippon India Large Cap Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+13.74%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.