Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund vs Kotak Debt Hybrid
Updated June 2026 · both Conservative Hybrid funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund has the higher 3-year return (+10.57%); Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.29%); Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.63). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund | Kotak Debt Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +3.84% | +1.39% |
| 3Y CAGR | +10.57% | +9.33% |
| 5Y CAGR | +9.40% | +9.10% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | 0.48 |
| Max drawdown | -2.3% | -4.4% |
| Volatility | 3.4% | 4.9% |
| Alpha | +3.51% | +3.10% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.29% | 0.48% |
| AUM | ₹3.3K Cr | ₹3.0K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.29%), versus 0.48% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+10.57%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.