PGIM India Global Equity Opportunities Fund of Fund vs DSP Global Innovation Overseas Equity Omni FoF
Updated June 2026 · both FoF Overseas funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: DSP Global Innovation Overseas Equity Omni FoF has the higher 3-year return (+27.31%); PGIM India Global Equity Opportunities Fund of Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.56%); DSP Global Innovation Overseas Equity Omni FoF has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.72). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | PGIM India Global Equity Opportunities Fund of Fund | DSP Global Innovation Overseas Equity Omni FoF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +23.91% | +34.99% |
| 3Y CAGR | +20.21% | +27.31% |
| 5Y CAGR | +10.16% | - |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.20 | 0.72 |
| Max drawdown | -43.4% | -27.6% |
| Volatility | 21.5% | 20.7% |
| Alpha | -9.44% | -1.96% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.56% | 1.17% |
| AUM | ₹1.5K Cr | ₹1.2K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
PGIM India Global Equity Opportunities Fund of Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.56%), versus 1.17% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
DSP Global Innovation Overseas Equity Omni FoF has the higher 3-year CAGR (+27.31%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.