Tata Money Market Fund vs ICICI Prudential Money Market Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Money Market funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: Tata Money Market Fund has the higher 3-year return (+7.48%); Tata Money Market Fund has the lower expense ratio (0.18%). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | Tata Money Market Fund | ICICI Prudential Money Market Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +6.20% | +6.03% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.48% | +7.32% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.64% | +6.46% |
| Sharpe ratio | - | - |
| Max drawdown | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| Volatility | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Alpha | +0.16% | -0.01% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.18% | 0.21% |
| AUM | ₹36.0K Cr | ₹34.2K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Tata Money Market Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (0.18%), versus 0.21% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
Tata Money Market Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+7.48%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.