UTI - Dividend Yield Fund vs Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund
Updated June 2026 · both Dividend Yield funds · metrics from AMFI NAVs
In short: UTI - Dividend Yield Fund has the higher 3-year return (+16.78%); Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund has the lower expense ratio (1.36%); Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe 0.73). This is analysis from past data, not a recommendation.
| Metric | UTI - Dividend Yield Fund | Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -2.86% | -3.78% |
| 3Y CAGR | +16.78% | +14.52% |
| 5Y CAGR | +13.23% | +13.93% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.60 | 0.73 |
| Max drawdown | -20.1% | -15.9% |
| Volatility | 14.4% | 12.7% |
| Alpha | +2.59% | +1.54% |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.51% | 1.36% |
| AUM | ₹2.4K Cr | ₹2.4K Cr |
Winner on each row highlighted (lower is better for expense ratio and volatility; max drawdown closer to zero is better). Computed from AMFI NAVs - see methodology. No paid placement.
FAQ
Which has the lower expense ratio?
Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund has the lower Direct-plan expense ratio (1.36%), versus 1.51% for the other. Over long horizons a lower TER compounds into a meaningful difference.
Which has performed better over 3 years?
UTI - Dividend Yield Fund has the higher 3-year CAGR (+16.78%). Past performance does not predict future returns - check volatility and drawdown too, shown above.
How are these figures calculated?
All returns, risk metrics and alpha are computed independently from AMFI daily NAVs using a disclosed methodology. FindMF takes no commission and this comparison is not a recommendation.